t’s rare these days to have an unvarnished, unexpected encounter with a work of art. So much of what we see tends to be primed by advertorial buzz or social-media mentions—that squelchy stuff on top of the reviews, the advertisements, and the friendly tips that structure modern consumption. I seldom experience, or let myself experience, walking into a gallery or concert hall knowing nothing of what I’ll find inside. But that’s what I did last fall, at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Busan, South Korea. The Busan Biennale had taken over most of the museum, a rectangular building with a lush, living façade—a “vertical garden” of plant species native to Korea. The exhibition inside was admirably global: artists from twenty-five nations were grouped under the theme of “We, on the Rising Wave,” a nod to Busan’s history as an international port.
I started on floor one, and jotted a few admiring notes—about the spare, willowy drawings of Qavavau Manumie, an Inuit artist from Nunavut, Canada, and a mournful eco-installation by Choong Sup Lim, a multi-disciplinary artist who grew up south of Seoul. Then, in a gallery on the lower floor, my body reacted before my mind. The room was all oil paintings by a single artist—two dozen of them, arranged in order of production, across four mint-colored walls. Scenes of Busan were rendered in strong horizontal lines, using an exaggerated linear perspective that made them simultaneously representational and otherworldly. They seemed to tell the entire history of modern Korea, from the colonial era, through civil war, to the digital present. Small, indistinct figures—of railroaders, mothers, fishermen, and commuters—dotted each tableau. The people and settings recapitulated themselves with energetic variation. The color groupings astonished me: in one cluster, mauves and dusky grays; in another, marine blues and greens that looked electric by comparison.
Sign up for the New Yorker Recommends newsletter.
Highlights from the week in culture, every Saturday. Plus: each Wednesday, exclusively for subscribers, the best books of the week.
I hadn’t heard of the artist, who had the rather unusual Korean name of Oh U-Am. Nor did I have a point of reference for his style. His paintings were guileless and skillful at once; the labor in them showed. They took as their subject matter actual slices of Korean history, yet seemed to exist in the timeless space of allegory. I learned from the wall text that the painter was eighty-four years old. He’d been orphaned during the Korean War and had spent three decades as a handyman in a Busan nunnery. He was entirely self-taught.
Who was he? Where did he live? I searched online and found only two photos and a few dated links. I reached out to the curator of the Busan Biennale, Kim Haeju, to learn more. Kim, who grew up in Busan and studied at the Sorbonne, explained that Oh hadn’t painted in earnest until his sixties. He didn’t have identifiable peers or fit into an artistic school. “He’s sort of an outsider artist,” she told me. “The style is somewhat naïve—unstudied.” Oh wasn’t well known, even in Korea, but had shown his work in Seoul many years earlier, at a now defunct gallery called ArtForum Newgate. Kim explained what an adventure it had been to track down his pieces for the show, between Oh’s house, private collections, provincial museums, and his former gallerist’s apartment.
I went to Seoul to meet that gallerist, Yum Hejung. She told me how, around 2004, she got a tip from a prominent art critic about Oh’s work. She went to Busan to court him, and found a sorry sight: he and his wife were living in a ramshackle rental, his canvases and paints scattered about. She resolved to represent him and, after months of coaxing, persuaded him to sell her a painting. She supplied him with oils and canvases and loaned his family money so they could move into a better apartment. In 2006 and 2010, Yum held solo exhibitions for Oh at ArtForum Newgate, titled “The Road” and “Sound of the Whistle,” respectively. The paintings in those shows were sombre in palette and subject matter, focussed on Busan’s past. But a third show, in 2015, titled “Life Is Beautiful,” presented canvases that were uncharacteristically cheery and set in contemporary Busan. The people in those paintings took on a rounder, more individualized cast. It was as though the sun had risen over Oh’s studio.
What happened between the second and third shows, Yum explained, was history butting into the life of a historical painter. In 2010, Korea’s central government informed Oh that his long-dead father had been identified as an anti-colonial activist and would be publicly honored as a patriot. In the late aughts, the progressive President Roh Moo-hyun had expanded a law giving formal recognition and cash benefits to members of the anti-colonial resistance and their descendants. Until then, many such families, including Oh’s, had been red-baited by Korean conservatives. Oh had always known that his father was left-wing and had disappeared in Japanese-occupied Manchuria, but wasn’t sure whether he’d gone there as an independence fighter or a forced laborer. The government’s finding allowed Oh to revise the script of his life and his family’s place in modern Korea. There was also a practical dimension: he would get a small but steady cash benefit every month.